Current contents of the Federal Cartel Office

Amazon now subject to stricter regulations – Bundeskartellamt determines its paramount significance for competition across markets (Section 19a GWB)

06.07.2022

Yesterday, the Bundeskartellamt formally determined that Amazon.com, Inc. based in Seattle, USA, is an undertaking of paramount significance for competition across markets. Amazon and its subsidiaries are thereby subject to extended abuse control pursuant to Section 19a of the German Competition Act (GWB).

Section 19a GWB entered into force in January 2021 as part of an amendment to the GWB. Following a two-step approach, it enables the Bundeskartellamt to prohibit undertakings which are of paramount significance for competition across markets from engaging in anti-competitive practices.

Andreas Mundt, President of the Bundeskartellamt: “Amazon is the key player in the e-commerce sector. The company acts as a seller, marketplace, streaming and cloud services provider, among others, and has combined its services to form a digital ecosystem. We have determined that the company is an undertaking of paramount significance for competition across markets, also within the meaning of competition law. Specifically, this step enables us to intervene and prohibit potential anticompetitive practices of Amazon more effectively. We consider Amazon to be dominant in regard to its marketplace services for third-party sellers. The Bundeskartellamt can therefore also engage in parallel traditional oversight over abuse of dominance, on the basis of which we are already conducting proceedings against Amazon.”

Amazon is in terms of revenue one of the largest companies worldwide, with a total revenue amounting to approximately 400 billion euros worldwide in 2021 (of which approximately 32 billion euros were generated in Germany). The Bundeskartellamt estimates that over every second euro spent in the German online retail business derives from purchases made on Amazon's trading platform (amazon.de). Besides its e-commerce business as seller and marketplace, Amazon also offers digital content (e.g. films, series or music) to end consumers as part of its Prime subscription. Amazon offers further services besides its marketplace to companies – particularly third-party sellers – in areas such as logistics, advertising and payment processing. Amazon is considered a leading provider of cloud computing services and generates a large proportion of its corporate profits through its Amazon Web Services (AWS) business (approximately 56% of its annual surplus in 2021).

Amazon’s paramount significance for competition across markets within the meaning of Section 19a(1) GWB confers the company a position of power which gives rise to a scope of action across markets that is not sufficiently checked by competition.

First, Amazon holds a key strategic position in the German online retail sector by virtue of its trading platform amazon.de. Amazon’s turnover-based market share in marketplace services for commercial sellers in Germany amounts to over 70%, which in the view of the Bundeskartellamt amounts to a dominant position. The enormous significance of Amazon’s trading platform is increased even further by its own retail activities (so-called hybrid structure). This is accompanied by Amazon’s power to set rules and its considerable influence on the business activities and business success of other companies. Amazon can thereby control the access of other companies to sales and procurement markets and use its dual role as a seller and as a marketplace. Amazon has combined its wide business portfolio to form a highly integrated digital ecosystem, which facilitates the retention of user groups within it. Amazon Prime plays an important role in this respect, offering end consumers a wide variety of services besides free shipping. Globally, more than 200 Mio. registered users have a paid Prime subscription. Furthermore, Amazon possesses considerable resources such as access to competitively relevant data and a high degree of financial power.

The validity of the decision of the Bundeskartellamt is limited to five years in accordance with statutory provisions. Within this period Amazon is subject to special abuse control in Germany by the Bundeskartellamt as set out in Section 19a(2) GWB.
The Bundeskartellamt has also published a case summary of its decision (in German) today, which is available here.

Background

Further Amazon proceedings

The Bundeskartellamt is currently conducting two proceedings against Amazon based on standard abuse control regulations that were in place before the Competition Act’s latest amendment (see press release of 18 May 2021). In one proceeding the Bundeskartellamt is investigating whether Amazon exercises influence on the pricing of sellers on Amazon Marketplace by means of price control mechanisms and algorithms. In a second proceeding the Bundeskartellamt is examining the extent to which agreements between Amazon and brand manufacturers (inter alia Apple), which exclude third-party sellers from selling brand products on Amazon Marketplace, constitute a competition law violation. In 2018, the Bundeskartellamt conducted an abuse proceeding against Amazon’s general terms of business and certain practices vis-à-vis third-party sellers. The proceeding was concluded in 2019 and brought significant improvements to sellers (see press release of 17 July 2019).

Section 19a GWB

The 10th amendment to the German Competition Act (“GWB-Digitalisierungsgesetz”, GWB Digitalisation Act) entered into force in January 2021. It introduced a key new provision (Section 19a GWB), which enables the Bundeskartellamt to intervene earlier and more effectively against the practices of large digital corporations. Prior to the proceeding concluded today, the Bundeskartellamt had already determined the paramount significance for competition across markets of Alphabet/Google and Meta/Facebook in decisions which are final (see press releases of 5 January 2022 and 4 May 2022). Further proceedings under the new regulations dealing with specific practices are also currently ongoing, for example against Google/Alphabet (see press releases of 21 June 2022, 4 June 2021 and 12 January 2022 and 25 May 2021), Meta/Facebook (see press release of 28 January 2021) and Apple (see press release of 14 June 2022)